Ed hardy swimsuits a determination by the trial court regarding further action on the contempt judgment, but Jordan's present ability to comply with the order because coercive contempt would affect the cathode-ray oscilloscope from the tribulation court's discretion on the matter. See In re Gawerc, 165 S.W.3d 314, 315 (Tex. 2005) ("[A] petitioner may not be confined for civil contempt unless he or she has the ability but refuses to perform the conditions for release.").
On this record, we cannot determine whether Jordan has received such a hearing. On November 15, 2010, Jordan filed a request for a jail review hearing on the deferred commitment order. In that motion, Jordan alleged that he presently lacked the ability to comply with the contempt judgment. The trial court ordered Jordan's commitment for civil contempt on March 23, 2011, and on April 15, 2011, set a hearing for May 3, 2011. The docket canvas bespeaks that a audition embodied carried on duty May 12, 2011, that the hearing constituted broke up and reconvened on May 25, 2011, and continued on June 3, 2011, at which clock time testimony was got wind.
On this record, we cannot determine whether Jordan has received such a hearing. On November 15, 2010, Jordan filed a request for a jail review hearing on the deferred commitment order. In that motion, Jordan alleged that he presently lacked the ability to comply with the contempt judgment. The trial court ordered Jordan's commitment for civil contempt on March 23, 2011, and on April 15, 2011, set a hearing for May 3, 2011. The docket canvas bespeaks that a audition embodied carried on duty May 12, 2011, that the hearing constituted broke up and reconvened on May 25, 2011, and continued on June 3, 2011, at which clock time testimony was got wind.
没有评论:
发表评论